User talk:Celestial Oblivion
Wintry Bees[edit]
Hey there. I see you edited the Bee Species page to say wintry bees require snow instead of flowers. Since this is something that's been changed a few times before, have you tested this?
Beealyzer and Apiarist Database say they require regular flowers. I have tried this before in Ultimate 1.1.0 with Forestry 2.0.0.11 and can confirm that. I put them in a Taiga biome and they would not work until I planted a flower next to them. Artsja (talk) 10:46, 26 May 2013 (CEST)
Charcoal Dust revert[edit]
Hi, why exactly did you revert this edit? I merged all info from that page into the main Charcoal Dust page, together with the GregTech dust. As far as I'm aware the two are compatible via the Ore Dictionary, so there is no real point in documenting them separately. --dgelessus (talk · contribs) 12:21, 21 January 2014 (CET)
- Well, on second thought it does seem we are merging all the ore articles of the same metal together, was that discussed anywhere? I'd support it but I'm just curious if that was officially decided. I really just wanted an explanation of why an article on my watchlist was deleted without warning, especially as I do not use Gregtech to know that its Charcoal dust was the same. Also, you forgot the pulverizer recipe. :p Celestial Oblivion (talk) 02:10, 22 January 2014 (CET)
- It wasn't discussed as far as I'm aware, which is why I also have my reservations bout it. Certainly given I've always been in favor of separate articles. But as I stated on the forums, I don't have a specific better solution. RZR0 ( Talk | Contributions) 12:51, 22 January 2014 (CET)
- It was "discussed" on Module talk:GT/NavItem ;) No one replied to my post there, so I went ahead and started merging the pages that had a (GregTech) suffix. At some point I also merged ore-dictionary-compatible items that were not from GregTech and nobody appeared to have a problem with it, so I just continued doing it. --dgelessus (talk · contribs) 12:59, 22 January 2014 (CET)
- Well, if no one replied that isn't exactly a discussion... This is something that needs to be discussed on the forums. RZR0 ( Talk | Contributions) 13:50, 22 January 2014 (CET)
- Indeed, I basically just ignore anything Gregtech, as I've never used it and can not contribute to any of its issues. But anyways, I've opened a forum discussion on it here. Celestial Oblivion (talk) 21:05, 22 January 2014 (CET)
- Odd, when I go to http://nocache.ftbwiki.org/Module_talk:GT/NavItem the page appears blank (no wonder there was limited input), but at http://ftbwiki.org/Module_talk:GT/NavItem it shows up fine. --timrem (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2014 (CET)
- It was "discussed" on Module talk:GT/NavItem ;) No one replied to my post there, so I went ahead and started merging the pages that had a (GregTech) suffix. At some point I also merged ore-dictionary-compatible items that were not from GregTech and nobody appeared to have a problem with it, so I just continued doing it. --dgelessus (talk · contribs) 12:59, 22 January 2014 (CET)
- It wasn't discussed as far as I'm aware, which is why I also have my reservations bout it. Certainly given I've always been in favor of separate articles. But as I stated on the forums, I don't have a specific better solution. RZR0 ( Talk | Contributions) 12:51, 22 January 2014 (CET)
[edit]
lol awesome idea! ƒelinoel ~ (Talk) 07:23, 8 February 2014 (CET)
- What, the Vanilla template? Celestial Oblivion (talk) 08:07, 8 February 2014 (CET)
- Yeah the Vanilla nav template. . ƒelinoel_ 08:14, 8 February 2014 (CET)
- Ah, well thanks! It was mainly a way to see just how many vanilla articles we had at a glance, but standardizing Vanilla like any other mod seems to be working out well. I thought you read the thread where I made the prototype though? Celestial Oblivion (talk) 08:17, 8 February 2014 (CET)
- ...did I? . ƒelinoel_ 08:23, 8 February 2014 (CET)
- Yup. :p http://ftbforums.org/topic/1073-so-i-made-a-template-for-vanilla-minecraft/ Celestial Oblivion (talk) 08:32, 8 February 2014 (CET)
- lol I responded to what was said, but I didn't go to the link. . ƒelinoel_ 09:05, 8 February 2014 (CET)
- Yup. :p http://ftbforums.org/topic/1073-so-i-made-a-template-for-vanilla-minecraft/ Celestial Oblivion (talk) 08:32, 8 February 2014 (CET)
- ...did I? . ƒelinoel_ 08:23, 8 February 2014 (CET)
- Ah, well thanks! It was mainly a way to see just how many vanilla articles we had at a glance, but standardizing Vanilla like any other mod seems to be working out well. I thought you read the thread where I made the prototype though? Celestial Oblivion (talk) 08:17, 8 February 2014 (CET)
- Yeah the Vanilla nav template. . ƒelinoel_ 08:14, 8 February 2014 (CET)
Thermal expansion edits[edit]
I have undone your edits to the thermal expansion navigator. These two sections of versions are highly different and need to be separated.--TehRawrz (talk) 20:45, 27 February 2014 (CET)
- Please do not undo changes until a consensus has been reached has been reached on the Te-nav page. While I personally do not care if we make a new template or not, some contributors want Te2 and Te3 to use the same Nav template and that was the previous community consensus. Since we have Te3 articles using the Te--nav and that was the initial state of things, I am undoing your rollback of my rollback. :p Celestial Oblivion (talk)
I was merely trying to clean up the clutter that troubles me so. I will refrain from working on thermal expansion until I'm told which way to go on the matter. --TehRawrz (talk) 21:57, 27 February 2014 (CET)
- I understand, and I do thank you for bring some attention to the matter and for your other edits on this wiki. Keep it up. Celestial Oblivion (talk) 22:02, 27 February 2014 (CET)
fyi[edit]
https://mojang.com/2014/04/minecraft-1-7-6-pre-release/ ƒelinoel ~ (Talk) 19:18, 21 April 2014 (CEST)
- Nice. Now maybe people on the server will have some idea of who I am the first time. :p Celestial Oblivion (talk) 19:38, 21 April 2014 (CEST)