Template talk:Navbox/Project Red
From Feed The Beast Wiki
So, this is basically just a copied Red Power 2 nav right? Are all of these items even in the mod yet? Celestial Oblivion (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2014 (CEST)
- Indeed <_< Should have its own nav and probably its own pages... ~~ RZR0 (Talk | Contributions) 20:18, 18 June 2014 (CEST)
- Straight copy? Yes. Some incorrect items? Indeed. Separate pages for PR's blocks? Only if they are significantly different. How much did the OR Gate change? Not enough to warrant an entire new article IMO. --dgelessus (talk · contribs) 22:27, 18 June 2014 (CEST)
- Well we've been moving more towards each mod being entirely documented on its own. Project Red having its own pages would be the ideal logical conclusion. In reality, yes, it is unlikely someone will write entirely different pages for Project Red so I'm guessing we'll just have to compromise on it. Celestial Oblivion (talk) 08:56, 19 June 2014 (CEST)
- I complained once to the sporadic gem ore generation on the MCF thread and found out that they aren't copying RedPower anymore and consider themselves their own entity.
. ƒelinoel_
10:52, 23 June 2014 (CEST)
- I complained once to the sporadic gem ore generation on the MCF thread and found out that they aren't copying RedPower anymore and consider themselves their own entity.
- Well we've been moving more towards each mod being entirely documented on its own. Project Red having its own pages would be the ideal logical conclusion. In reality, yes, it is unlikely someone will write entirely different pages for Project Red so I'm guessing we'll just have to compromise on it. Celestial Oblivion (talk) 08:56, 19 June 2014 (CEST)
- Straight copy? Yes. Some incorrect items? Indeed. Separate pages for PR's blocks? Only if they are significantly different. How much did the OR Gate change? Not enough to warrant an entire new article IMO. --dgelessus (talk · contribs) 22:27, 18 June 2014 (CEST)
